And when there came to them a Book from Allâh verifying that which they have, and aforetime they used to pray for victory against those who disbelieved, but when there came to them that which they did recognize, they disbelieved in him; so Allâh's curse is on the unbelievers (89). Evil is that for which they sold their souls - that they should deny what Allâh has revealed, out of envy that Allâh should send down of His grace on whomsoever of His servants He pleases; so they returned with wrath upon wrath, and there is a disgraceful punishment for the unbelievers (90). And when it is said to them, "Believe in what Allâh has revealed, " they say: "We believe in that which was revealed to us;" and they deny what is besides that, while it is the truth verifying that which they have. Say: "Why then did you kill Allâh's prophets before if you were indeed believers?" (91) . And most certainly Musâ came to you with clear evidence, then you took the calf (for a god) in his absence and you were unjust (92). And (remember) when We made a covenant with you and raised the mountain over you: "Take hold of what We have given you with firmness and listen (to Our words)". They said: "We hear and disobey. " And they were made to imbibe (the love of) the calf into their hearts on account of their unbelief. Say: "Evil is that which your belief bids you if you are believers" (93).
QUR’ĀN: And when there came to them a Book: The context shows that "a Book" refers to the Qur’ân.
QUR’ĀN : and aforetime they used to pray for victory against those who disbelieved: It appears that whenever the pagans of Arabia clashed with the Jews, the latter prayed for victory by the right of the Prophet, and by his prophethood and emigration; and that this was their usual custom before the advent of the Prophet, so much so that even the pagans knew it of them. It all is implied in the word, "they used to".
QUR’ĀN: but when there came to them that which they did recognize: They knew that Muhammad (s.a.w.a.) was the awaited Prophet, because all the attributes and particulars mentioned in their books fitted on him perfectly. And yet they denied his truth.
QUR’ĀN: Evil is that for which they sold their souls. . .: "Baghyan " ( = out of envy) is in accusative case, explaining the reason why they disbelieved in Muhammad (s.a.w.a.) even after recognizing him. What they did was "out of envy", "that Allâh should send down of His grace on whomsoever of His servants He pleases" was the object of their envy. "so they returned with wrath upon wrath", that is, they returned doubly enraged. It may also mean that they invited double wrath of Allâh upon themselves - the first because they disbelieved in Torah and the second because they disbelieved in the Qur’ân.
The verse says that they were partisans of the Prophet long before he was born; they prayed to Allâh for victory by his name and his Book. When the Prophet was sent and the Qur’ân was revealed, they very well recognized that he was the Prophet in whose name they used to pray for victory, and whose coming they awaited. But they were overwhelmed by envy and arrogance. No sooner did the Prophet begin his call then they denied his truth, and forgot all that they used to tell about the awaited prophet. It was not surprising as they had earlier disbelieved in Torah too. Thus they committed disbelief after disbelief, and invited the wrath of Allâh upon themselves, not once but twice.
QUR’ĀN: and they deny what is besides that: That is, they claim that they do not believe in any book other than Torah; but the fact is that they do not believe even in Torah.
QUR’ĀN: Say: "Why then did you kill Allâh's prophets. . . ": The conjunctive, "then", serves to relate this question to their claim, "We believe in that which was revealed to us". If this claim of yours is correct then why did you kill the prophets of Allâh? And why did you disbelieve in Musâ by taking the calf for a god? And why did you say, "We hear and disobey", when We took a promise from you and lifted the mountain over you?
QUR’ĀN : and they were made to imbibe (the love of) the calf into their hearts: "al-Ishrâb" ( = to make to imbibe, to make to drink). Instead of saying `the love of the calf', the verse says, "to imbibe the calf", for emphasis, as though they had drunk the calf itself into their hearts. The sentence thus contains two metaphors - "the calf" for the love of the calf, and imbibing into hearts for loving.
QUR’ĀN : Say: "Evil is that which your belief bids you. . . ": It is a derisive expression ridiculing them for their killings of the prophets, their disbelief in Musâ and their arrogance in committing sin after sin and then claiming that they were the true believers. The verse tauntingly asks them: Is this what your belief bids you?
as-Sâdiq (a.s.) explained the verse, and when there came to them a Book from Allâh verifying that which they have. . ., in this way: "The Jews found in their books that Muhammad (s.a.w.a.), the Messenger of Allâh, would migrate and settle between `Ayr and Uhud. So, they went out looking for that place. They passed by a mountain called Hadâd; and they said: `Hadâd -and Uhud are the same'. So they dispersed nearby; some of them settled at Taymâ', and some others at Fadak and yet others at Khaybar. Those at Taymâ' once desired (to see) some of their brethren (at another place). A Bedouin from (the tribe of) Qays passed by them and they hired (his camels).
He told them: `I shall take you from between `Ayr and Uhud.' They told him: `When you pass between the two, tell us.' When they reached the land of Medina, he said: `That is `Ayr and this is Uhud.' They descended from his camels and said to him: `We have now found (the place of) our desire; now we do not need your camels, you may go wherever you wish.' Then they wrote to their brethren at Fadak and Khaybar: `We have found the place, come therefore to us.' They wrote in reply: `Now we have settled in this place, and have acquired properties; and we are so near to you. Therefore, when it will happen (i.e., when the Prophet will come to Medina), we shall rush to you.' Those Jews acquired properties in the land of Medina. When their wealth increased, its news came to the ears of Tubba’ and he attacked them. They fortified themselves and he laid siege to them. (And they used to take pity on the weekly soldiers of Tubba` and throw dates and barley to them at night. This came to the notice of Tubba` and he softened towards them. He assured them of their safety and they came down to him. He told them: `I do like this place of yours and I am inclined to settle down here.' They said: `It is not for you. It is the migration place of a prophet; and no one may settle down here until that happens.' Thereupon he said: `Then I am leaving among you some of the members of my clan, so that when it happens they shall help and assist him.' Thus he left behind the two tribes you see today, the Aws and the Khazraj. When these two (tribes) increased in number, they used to grab the properties of the Jews. At that time, the Jews used to warn them: `Oh! when Muhammad (s.a.w.a.) is sent (by Allâh) we shall certainly turn you out from our town and properties.' But when Muhammad (s.a.w.a.) was sent as Prophet, it was the Helpers (the Aws and the Khazraj) who believed in him and the very Jews denied him! This is the meaning of the words of Allâh, and aforetime they used to pray for victory against those who disbelieved. . . " (al-`Ayyâshî )
Ibn Ishâq, Ibn Jarîr, Ibn al-Mundhir, Ibn Abî Hâtim and Abû Na'aym (in his Dalâ'ilu 'n-nubuwwah) have narrated from Ibn `Abbâs that he said: "The Jews used to pray for victory against the Aws and the Khazraj by the right of the Messenger of Allâh, before he was sent as prophet. However, when Allâh raised him from the Arabs, the same Jews disbelieved in him and denied what they used to say about him. Mu'âdh ibn Jabal, Bishr ibn Barâ' ibn Ma'rûr and Dâwûd ibn Salamah told them: `O Jews! Fear Allâh and accept Islam; because it was you who used to pray for victory against us by the right of Muhammad, while we were polytheists, and you used to tell us that he would (soon) be sent, describing to us his attributes.' Salâm ibn Mushkîm, one of the tribe of Banû an Nadîr, said to them: `He has not brought to us anything we know; and he is not the prophet we were telling you about.' Then Allâh sent down (the verse): `And when there came to them a Book from Allâh . . . ' " (ad-Durru '1-manthûr)
Abu Nu'aym has narrated in his Dalâ'ilu 'n-Nubuwwah from the chains of `Atâ' and ad-Dahhâk, from Ibn `Abbâs that he said: "The Jews of Banû Qurayzah and Banû an-Nadîr, before Muhammad (s.a.w.a.) was sent as prophet, used to pray to Allâh for victory, invoking Him against the disbelievers and saying: `O Allâh! We seek Thy help, by the right of the untaught prophet, to let us triumph over them.' And they were given victory. But when there came to them that which they did recognize (i.e., Muhammad - s.a.w.a.) , and actually they had no doubt whatsoever about him, they disbelieved in, and denied him. (ad-Durru 'l-manthûr )
The author says: Similar traditions have been narrated by various other chains also.
A commentator, after pointing to the last mentioned traditions and others like them, says: "These traditions - weak as their narrators are and incompatible as they are with the narrated traditions - are anomalous in their meaning too, because they maintain that the prayer for victory was made `by the person of the Prophet' or, as some traditions say, `by the right of the Prophet'; and such a prayer is against the sharî`ah; and no one has any right on Allâh. How could prayer be offered with the help of such a non-existent right?
Reply: This objection results from not understanding the meaning of "right" and oath. Oath is used to join and bind a proposition, order, request or exclamation to an honourable and sublime thing - if that proposition etc. is wrong, the honour and sublimity of the thing bound to it, is tarnished and damaged. When you say, "By my life, Zayd is standing", you have bound the honour of your life to the truth of your statement; if that statement be wrong, your life would loose its honour. When you say, "By my life, I shall do this work", or "I entreat you, by my life, to do this work", you have, in the same way, put the honour of your life at stake for that work; if you did not do it, or if the second party did not heed to your entreaty, your life would loose its honour, its dignity. Two things emerge from this explanation:
First: Oath is the strongest method of emphasizing a talk, as the scholars of literature have confirmed.
Second: The thing by which one swears, must be more honourable and more important than the proposition etc. which it is related to; because a proposition cannot be emphasized with the help of a less important thing. Allâh has sworn, in His Book, by His own name and attributes. For example, So, by your Lord, We would most certainly question them all (15 :92). Also, He quotes others swearing by His name and attributes: By Allâh, our Lord . . . (6:23) ; Then by Thy Might I will surely make them live an evil life (38:82) . But He has also sworn by His Prophet, His angels and His books, as well as by His creatures like the heaven, the earth, the sun, the moon, the stars, the night, the day, the mountains, the rivers, the towns, the man, the tree, the fig and the olive. It could not be possible unless these things had a real dignity of their own bestowed on them by Allâh; every such thing must have an attribute reflecting one of the divine attributes, or an activity related to the divine sublimity and every dignity and honour emanates from Him.
Now, what objection can be raised against a suppliant, if he prays to Allâh for something entreating Him by one of the above-mentioned things - considering the fact that Allâh Himself has sworn by those things and has given them a sublimity and dignity? Why an exception should be made in case of the Apostle of Allâh only? Is it not an affront to the Prophet to remove him from this common way of showing respect? By my life, Muhammad, the Apostle of Allâh (s. a. w. a.) is not less honourable in the eyes of Allâh than an Iraqi fig or a Syrian olive! These people forget that Allâh Himself has sworn by His Prophet: By your life! they were blindly wandering on in their intoxication (15 :72).
Now we should have a look at the "right". Right, as opposed to wrong, means a factual thing, existing outside imagination, like the earth and the man; in short, every real and substantial thing, as opposed to illusory and imaginary ones. Monetory and other social rights come within this category because they are firmly established by the society.
The Qur’ân has nullified all the rights claimed by man, except that which is laid down and confirmed by Allâh - in creation as well as in legislation. Right in the legislative and social spheres is that which Allâh Himself has established, like the monetary rights, the rights of the brothers and the rights of the parents etc.
It is necessary to mention here that no one can lay down a right against Allâh, no one can make it incumbent upon Allâh to do or give something. But it is possible for Allâh to make it incumbent upon Himself to do something, or to give someone something, all in the sphere of legislation. Then that "someone" shall have a right on Allâh which Allâh Himself has established. For example, Allâh says: even so (now) it is a right on Us (that) We deliver the believers (10:103); And certainly Our word has already gone forth in respect of Our servants, the apostles: Most surely they shall be assisted ones, and most surely Our host alone shall be the victorious ones (37:171-173)
The assistance, promised here, is general and unconditional, not restricted by any proviso. Getting deliverance is the right of the believers on Allâh, and getting assistance is, in the same way, the right of the apostles. By establishing this right on Himself for the apostles, Allâh has enhanced their dignity and honour. And there is nothing to prevent a suppliant from entreating Allâh to help and deliver him from his difficulties, by the right of His apostle or apostles. Allâh Himself has laid down that right and He Himself swears by every honourable thing, showing us that such oaths and adjurations are in fact liked by Him.
In short, there is no hitch in entreating Allâh by His Apostle or by the right of His Apostle. The same applies to entreating Him by His friends, or by the right of His friends. He has established a right for them on Himself that He will surely assist them in the path of happiness, with every related assistance.
The claim that "no one has any right on Allâh" is just a nonsense. Of course, no one can lay down a right for himself on Allâh; no one can make it incumbent on Allâh to do some thing. But a suppliant does not pray to Allâh by a right forced on Allâh by someone else; he pleads to Him by a right which He Himself has established pledging His Own word; and His Promise is never broken.