|
Taken from
The Un-schooled Prohet
By Allama Murtaza Mutahhari
Chapter III.
The Adversaries Accusation
--------------------------
It was mentioned at the very beginning of the
book that: "The opponents of Islam and the
Prophet (PBUH&HF) accused him of borrowing ideas from
others (this accusation is reflected from some
verses of the Qur'an). But they did not say that he
was literate and knew how to read and write and
that he perhaps had some books which he consulted
before presenting his views."
Someone might, however, claim that the
Prophet (PBUH&HF) was accused in this respect too. This
accusation is reflected from the Qur'an where it
says:
They say: The stories of the ancient he has got
them written down - so that these are recited to
him morning and evening (25:5)
The answer is that this verse does not explicit-
ly indicate their claim that the Prophet (PBUH&HF) used
to write, regardless of the fact that the opponents'
accusations were so prejudiced and based on com-
plexes and grudges that, as the Holy Qur'an puts it,
only terms like "injustice" and "oppression" can
best be used for them. At the same time, the Arabic
term "iktitab" means both "to write" and "istiktab"
i.e to make someone write something.
Here, the second meaning applies to the verse
which would mean "They said: 'He has written (or
others have written for him) the stories of the
ancient, then someone reads to him every morning
and evening," "Iktitab" is mentioned here in the
past tense and "imla"' in the present continuous.
It implies that someone wrote them, and that those
who knew how to read, used to come to Prophet
(PBUH&HF) every day and night and read them to him,
and that he learned and memorized them. Thus, if
the Prophet (PBUH&HF) knew how to read, they would
not necessarily say that others used to read to him
day and night; rather, it would suffice them to say
that he himself referred to writings and memorized
them.
Therefore, even the oppressive and accusing
infidels of his time, who accused the Prophet (PBUH&HF)
in many ways and named him an insane, a sorcerer,
a liar and an imitator of others' oral statements,
etc, could not claim that he read the contents of
other books to them due to his inability to read
and write.
Contributed by Br. Ali Abbas, abbas@seas.gwu.edu
|