Conclusion: Zahra’s speech describes the social conditions after usurpation of Caliphate and identifies the ills in politics and government
In the end we refer to five points indicated by Zahra to Ansaar ladies in her speech. And we end this volume thereat.
The ladies visited Zahra to see her and inquire into her health because Zahra was sick at home as her sides were broken due to the door falling on her by the kick of her enemy.
Zahra sketched to them a picture of society of tomorrow – a society deprived of Imamate and Guardianship of Ali bin Abi Talib (‘a) and molded into the present illegitimately running government:
“Beware of pulled out swords, sharp and destructive – and a tyrant attack advancing atrocities and a haughty stubbornness of oppressors.
All your affairs will be upset except the haughtiness of tyrant and you will be given your lot but little.
Your gatherings will be separated by swords. You will harvest nothing but fruit of disappointed hope. Where will you go; and where will your destiny end.”1
A history of thirteen years of national rivalry from Saqifah and finally its surrender to Bani Umayyah who held it so tightly under their claws showed deviation of Muslims from the path prescribed by Quran through His Prophet and the Prophet announced it in Ghadeer. The consequences that followed – how horrible, how dreadful and how destructively fatal!
It was not only the matter of tyranny to Ahlul Bayt (‘a). The tyrannies committed against the dearest ones to God, against the purified personalities of time immemorial cannot be confined to writing by any pen. Although endeavors were made to make history forget or take it as little as possible the rightfulness of Ali to Caliphate, which was usurped so openly by the conspiracy of Saqifah. While they claim:
“People liked the method of Caliphate of Abu Bakr and Umar! And were really fond of it! They were sure their Caliphate was truly based on the method of Prophet. They could live in safety under this Caliphate from tyranny and danger.”!2
- 1. Mahdi Ja’fari: Mastoor Aaftaab-e-Sarmad, Pgs. 190-194; quoting from: Ibn Taifur: Balaghatun Nisa, Pg. 32; Jauhari: Saqifah wa Fadak, Pg. 117; Ibn Abil Hadeed: Sharh Nahjul Balagha, Vol. 16, Pg. 233; Umar Reza Kahhala: Alaamun Nisa, Vol. 3, Pg. 1219.
- 2. Abdul Qadir Dahqaan Siraawaani: Article quoted in Nida-e-Islam Magazine, Issue No. 14, Summer 82, Pg. 16.
- A Victim Lost In Saqifah - Revised Edition with Comprehensive Additions
- A Victim Lost in Saqifah Vol. 1
- Dedication
- Acknowledgement
- Preface
- Introduction: Fundamentals Of Evaluation And Criticism Of Writings On Islamic Unity
- Beginning Of Discussion: Awareness Of Basics Of Intellectual Movement – Research Towards Creating Islamic Unity
- Introduction To Applications Of Two Tendencies By Way Of Criticism And Narration
- Discourse 1: Keeping Quiet And Prohibiting Difference-Creating Activities
- Discourse 2: Adopt Common Things And Ignore Differences Between Islamic Sects
- Discourse 3: To Make Difference Between Two Schools So Light As To Appear Depthless
- Discourse 4: Excusing Those Who Turn Away From Imamate And School Of Ahlul Bayt (‘a)
- Discourse 5: Alterations In Beliefs Of Shia Ja’fari Twelve Imamite Faith
- First Alteration: Imamate And Rulership
- Second Alteration: Removing Imamate From Principles Of Faith And Making It A Fundamental Of School
- Third Alteration: Aim Of Eschewing Shia Teachings
- Introduction
- A – Taking Benefit Of A Deviated Thought, Silence, An Excuse To Maintain Islamic Demeanor?
- B – To Show Differences Between Ali And Caliphs As Friendly
- C – Denial Of Enmity In A Sense Of Blame, To Show Relations Were Intimate Between Ali And Caliph
- D – To Show Rulership Worthless From Ali’s Viewpoint
- E – Mending The Method Of Shia Propaganda
- Introduction
- Closing Reminder
- Discourse 6: Deviation In The Meaning Of Divinely-Granted Caliphate Of Ali
- Introduction
- Criticism And Analysis
- First Conjecture: Imamate And Guardianship In Islam Are Only For The Sake Of Rulership!
- Second Conjecture: Rulership In Islam Is An Elected Post!
- How To Utilize These Conjectures To Create Deviation In The Meaning Of Divinely-Given Caliphate Of Ali
- Conjecture A: Deviation In The Sense Of Guardianship By Separating Imamate And Rulership
- Conjecture B: Deviation In The Sense Of Text Following Deviation In The Meaning Of Imamate
- Result Of This Manipulation
- Deviated Repercussion Of These Conjectures
- First Wrong Result: Caliphate Is Not A Monopoly Of Amirul Momineen (‘a)!
- Second Wrong Result: Caliph Cannot Be Exclusively Ali After The Prophet
- Third Wrong Result: Usurpation Of Ali’s Caliphate Is No More In Question!
- Fourth Wrong Result: Caliphate Of Caliphs Is Not Illegitimate!
- Warning: Propagation Of These Conjectures In The Name Of Open-Mindedness
- Relation Of Imamate And Caliphate From Shia Viewpoint
- Introduction
- Discourse 7: Denial Of Differences Between Ali And Caliphs
- Discourse 8: To Acknowledge The Legitimacy Of Caliphs’ Government
- Addendum: Solution Of Shia To Create Islamic Unity
- End: Reflection On Shia Ideal Of Islamic Unity In The Zahra’s Speech (S.A.)
- A Victim Lost in Saqifah Vol. 2
- Discourse 1: Criticism And Investigation About Propaganda Of Silence Of Amirul Momineen (‘a)
- Doubts Created Regarding Silence Of Amirul Momineen (‘a)
- First Category: Conjectures That Claim ‘Letting Go Of Caliphate Linked With Consent’
- Style Of Criticizing The First Category Of Conjectures
- Style Of Criticizing The Second Category Of Conjectures
- Third Category: Conjectures That Claim ‘Absence Of Plan Of Right Of Caliphate And Not Proving The School Of Imamate’.
- Style Of Criticizing The Third Category Of Conjectures
- Did Amirul Momineen (‘a) Leave Caliphate And Overlook His Rights?
- Correct Analysis About Ali’s Reaction To Usurpation Of Caliphate
- Correct Interpretation Ali’s Silence And Its Causes
- Amirul Momineen (‘a) And His Stern Refusal To Pay Allegiance To Abu Bakr
- Amirul Momineen (‘a) and Declaration of Illegitimacy of Caliphate
- Final Judgment on Silence of Amirul Momineen (‘a)
- To what extent Ali Believed in Preserving Silence?
- Did Ali Refrain From Arguing About Imamate?
- Are Shias Obliged Not To Debate On Imamate?
- Another Point
- Doubts Created Regarding Silence Of Amirul Momineen (‘a)
- Discourse 2: Criticism And Scrutiny Of Analyses Propagated About Consultation Of Caliphs With Ali
- What Doubts Are Propagated In This Regard?
- Does Consultation Alone Suffices To Prove Good Relations?
- Analysis Of Consultation Of Caliphs With Amirul Momineen (‘a) On The Basis Of Statistical Scrutiny
- What does Scrutiny of Statistics show?
- Results Of Statistical Analysis
- Final Analysis about Caliphs’ Consultation with Amirul Momineen (‘a)
- Theological Reminder
- Differences between the Aims of Caliphs and Ali Regarding Consultations
- Discourse 3: Criticism And Scrutiny Of Analyses Publicized Regarding Ali’s Cooperation With Caliphs’ Government
- Conjectures Spread In This Regard
- What Do Historical Documents And Sources Indicate?
- Conclusion
- Analysis Of Ali’s Participation In Caliphs’ Government
- What Was Caliphs’ Aim In Giving Government Responsibilities To Ali?
- Was Ali given a Governmental responsibility during the tenure of the Caliphs?
- Did Amirul Momineen (‘a) Have Positive Outlook To Battles Of Caliph’s Period?
- Criticism and Scrutiny of Ali’s Positive Outlook to Battles
- Participation of Hasan and Husayn (‘a) in battles of Caliphs
- Scrutiny Of Participation Of Ali’s Companions In Battles And Government Of Caliphs
- Are Battles Of Caliphs Worth Defending?
- Forced Participations Of Amirul Momineen Ali (‘a) In Caliphs’ Government
- Did Amirul Momineen (‘a) Always Attend Caliphs’ Prayers?
- Discourse 4: Scrutiny And Criticism Of Analyses Publicized In Respect Of Relations Between Caliphs And Amirul Momineen (‘a)
- What Conjectures Are Presented In This Regard?
- Part A) Relations Of The First Caliph With The Family Of Revelation (‘a)
- Part B) Relations Of The Second Caliph With The Family Of Revelation (‘a)
- Did the Second Caliph desire Ali to be Caliph after him?
- Scrutiny of the legend of Second Caliph’s Marriage with Umm Kulthum
- A) The Prosperity In The Next World For Umar By Means Of This Marriage
- B) Immunity Of Second Caliph About Crimes Committed Against Ahlul Bayt (‘a)
- C) Suggestion Of Umar Having Gained The Satisfaction Of Ahlul Bayt Particularly That Of Hazrat Zahra (S.A.)
- D) Baraat, A Principle Of Shia Belief Now Is Put Under Question
- E) Enmity And Rancor Of Umar Towards Ali Is Covered
- F) To Show Relations Between Ali And Umar To Be Friendly
- G) Giving Legitimacy To Umar’s Caliphate And Distancing It From The Term Of Usurpation
- Can Only Marriage With Bin Hashim Be A Proof Of Friendship?
- Criticism And Investigation
- How Many Daughters Did Ali Have Named Umm Kulthum?
- Outlook Of Ayatullah Marashi Najafi
- Another Analysis About The Marriage Of Umm Kulthum With Umar
- Part C) Relations of the Third Caliph with the House of Divine Revelation
- Discourse 5: Publicized Analysis About The Relation Of Amirul Momineen (‘a) With Caliphs
- Discourse 1: Criticism And Investigation About Propaganda Of Silence Of Amirul Momineen (‘a)
- A Victim Lost in Saqifah Vol. 3 - A Glance at thirteen years of Caliphs’ reign since Saqifah
- Motive Of This Research
- Introduction: Claim Of Righteous Caliphate Is Untrue
- Discourse 1: Piety And Simplicity Scrutinized
- Motive of Caliphs’ Piety
- Political Piety
- Piety or Public Deception
- Hypocritical Piety
- Personal use of Public Funds
- Clandestine Luxury
- Support to Royal life and Hoarding Wealth
- Properties of Staff Members
- Selection of officers
- Piety without a Holy war
- Pleasant Food
- Rivalry to piety of Amirul Momineen (‘a)
- Discourse 2: Scrutiny Of Social Justice
- Help To The Deprived
- Love for the People
- Social Classes
- Policy of Racial Discrimination
- 1 – Prohibition For Non-Arabs To Enter Medina
- 2 – Retaliation Of Arab Through Non-Arab Prohibited
- 3 – Prohibition To Speak In Language Other Than Arabic
- 4 – Objection Against Rulership Of Nobles Over Quraish
- 5 – Restriction For Non-Arabs To Marry Arab Ladies
- 6 – Minimum Possible Allowance For Non-Arabs From Public Treasury
- 7 – Distinction Between An Arab Living In A Town And An Arab Living In Deserts
- Racial Discrimination Resulted In Advantage To Arabs
- Cause of Rulers’ Greatness in view of Arabs
- Influence of Greatness of Rulers over Ali’s Government
- Discourse 3: Scrutiny Of Judicial Justice
- Discourse 4: Analysis Of The Rights Of Legal Opponents
- Discourse 5: Analysis Of Individual And Social Liberties
- Conclusion: Zahra’s speech describes the social conditions after usurpation of Caliphate and identifies the ills in politics and government
- A Victim Lost in Saqifah Vol. 4: Allegiance (Bay’at) of Amirul Momineen Ali (‘a) to Caliphs – contamination of Shia belief in Imamate
- Section One: Allegiance Of Amirul Momineen (‘a) To Caliphs
- Discourse 1: Absence Of Ali’s Approval To Abu Bakr’s Caliphate
- Discourse 2: Efforts To Obtain Imam Ali’s (‘a) Bay’at After The Prophet’s Demise
- Discourse 3: Lack Of Public Satisfaction From Abu Bakr’s Caliphate
- Discourse 4: Efforts To Prove The Bay’at Was Of Free Choice After Zahra’s Martyrdom
- A Suspicion
- Cause of Zahra’s wrath against Abu Bakr
- Motive Of Sunnis In Proving The Occurrence Of This Bay’at?
- In How Many Ways Sunnis Narrate This Incident?
- Criticism of Three Standards in Narrations of Sunni Sources Concerning willing Bay’at
- First Standard: Scrutiny Into Allegation Of Becoming Murtad Of Some Arabs
- A) Investigation On Reliability Of This Narration
- B) Analysis Of Proof Of This Narration
- C 1) Evidences That Show Deviation In Al-Gharaat
- C – 2) Results Of The Investigation Of Above Evidences
- D) A Look Towards Inadvertency Of Balazari To The Contents Of The Letter Of Ali
- Section Two; Influence Of Deviation On Shia Belief Of Imamate
- A Victim Lost in Saqifah Vol. 1